The little red county that could

A wise man once asked, “Who has despised the day of small beginnings?”  It’s amazing to see how quickly many in the political realm seem to answer in the affirmative to this centuries old question.  Perhaps it’s because so many have gotten their start through government grants or subsidies that the idea of a small beginning is to them irrelevant.  Or maybe some could be so controlled by the impatient, selfish craving for power that the arduous slow rise to influence, and the life-lessons learned thereby, are deemed unfruitful and callously tossed aside for the shortcuts to control, however unseemly they may be.  The end justifies the means and those voices, which are small in their eyes, are ignored for the brash and strident.

But the question to the despised is a simple one.  Will they allow disdain to silence their voice or will they continue to stand with the integrity and strength hardened by adversity?  It was another wise man that issued this charge to a young student thrust into leadership.  “Let no man despise thy youth.”  The lesson for this young man was that, while he could not control the actions of others, he could control his own.  He could let the disdain of others deter him from his goals and capitulate to their opinion or he could stand for what he believed and exercise his responsibilities with excellence in the face of shallow critique.

Now enter The Red County Caucus.  Its title taken from the political nickname of one of the smallest counties in all of New England, a group of residents from this little county in Maine decided to form a caucus that would stand for the precepts of conservatism and common sense.  Piscataquis County received the nickname “The Red County” because it has proven itself to be a bastion of Republican and Conservative strength.  Despite its small size, Piscataquis surprised the political world when it stood alone as the only County in all of New England to vote against Barack Obama, marring a complete sweep of New England by Democrats.  George Soros and his ilk then targeted the little County. They set up headquarters in the County seat hoping to break the strength of Piscataquis.

Representative and former Senate minority leader Paul Davis responded by forming The Red County Caucus.  He joined forces with now retired Senator Doug Smith and Representative Pete Johnson of Greenville along with conservative columnist Andy Torbett.  Their first political statement was to endorse then candidate Paul LePage, which was instrumental in his election as Governor and helped to provide the Republicans their first majority in forty years.  Now the Presidential primary is upon us.

The Red County Caucus has watched the primary with great interest and, after much discussion, has decided to endorse Governor Mitt Romney for President.  While there are others in this primary that tout their conservative credentials, a close examination of their voting record shows a concerning vacillation from those principles at times during their public service and in certain votes.  Perhaps there are valid reasons for this that can be debated, but Governor Romney has shown a steady growth and movement toward conservatism throughout his various tenures of leadership, both private and public.  There is enough evidence of this to convince these four Conservative leaders of Piscataquis County that he will defend the beliefs and tenets that we hold crucial to a great Society; a small, fiscally conservative government and a strong, vibrant, traditional American family.

The Red County Caucus calls upon their fellow Conservatives across the Nation to join them in supporting Mitt Romney for the nomination.  The Red County Caucus would also like to take this time to express its disappointment with those in the media and so many political pundits who have tried to draw a caricature of social conservatives so blinded by our several beliefs that we could forgo the future security of this Great Nation for a political statement.  On the contrary, we, The Red County Caucus, stand secure in our belief that all freedom loving Americans, Moderates, Conservatives, Independents and Tea Party Patriots alike, will stand together united in a common goal to defend the United States from four more years of President Barack Obama.

Red County Caucus Presidential Endorsement

PRESS RELEASE
The Red County Caucus

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Andy Torbett (Chairman)    CONTACT #: (207) 564-9071
DATE: March 15, 2012

Red County Caucus Supports Romney

The Red County Caucus, a group of Conservative Republicans from
Piscataquis County, takes its name from the fact that it has been the
only County in New England to support all Republican candidates in
recent elections. Of particular note was the fact that it was the only
New England County to support McCain/Palin in 2008, helping set the
stage for a 2010 Republican resurgence in Maine.  Today the Red County
Caucus announced it was supporting Mitt Romney for President of the
United States.

In making the endorsement, the RCC stated its view that Romney has
allayed most concerns in re-asserting his conservative credentials and
proving that he has the ability to attract all segments of the
Republican Party.  “Of paramount concern,” it said in making the
endorsement, “is that we have a strong and principled conservative
leader who has the ability to attract a large cross-section of the
electorate including Conservatives, Moderates, Tea Party Patriots, and
Independents who are deeply concerned about the direction of the Obama
Administration’s policies.  In our considered opinion, Mitt Romney is
clearly the best candidate and has the very best chance of defeating
the most disastrous president in our Nation’s history.”

We urge our fellow citizens across this State and Nation to join us
supporting Mitt Romney for President and ignite a new era of freedom
and prosperity.

The President and a King

 

One winter a King and for his palace, a tent. 

His quest for power came through power

 

And in the subsidies where money was spent. 

 

 

He gleaned for himself considerable wealth

And crafted his own gilded tower

Power by rule, power by stealth

And to this task he was bent

 

The trek of this King that found him in Maine

Would trade him his palace, a tent

For a mansion of wood that was Blaine

A Governor who called himself King

Who knew of his final intent?

What of the wind? What will it bring?

Its breezes have subsidies sent

 

Bluster, a gale, a storm’s in the air

A powerful change could ensue

And more wealth is waiting out there

If such a King could get himself close

To one who is leading the Blue?

For subsidies, he has the most

The King needs the President

 

He advocates laws

That force us to buy

Just what the King wants to sell

 

Once under their paws

No matter the lies

We’ll all have to answer the bell

 

Now that this King is farming the wind

The laws state we must buy his farm

And if he fails we also must pay him to mend

It’s all just a system to rig

The President does it with charm

We pay it all!  What a gig!

 

The money who knows where it went

 

 

A King wishes now and it is his intent

To get closer to money for power

There are subsidies that need to be spent

The President holds considerable wealth

He in his own gilded tower

 

Power by rule! Power by stealth!

 

A King and a President


Adults

Most of the time these columns are spent defending the tenets of Conservatism and those that espouse them.  In this piece, this columnist must take some exception with the behavior of a few within my own Conservative ranks.  Their actions have moved beyond the necessary confines of decency and common sense.

I refer to a new popular program called “The Five”.  It consists of five political pundits who sit around a table and debate, in sometimes colorful fashion, the various issues of the day.  While I generally find the program entertaining and informative, today there was a segment that gave pause and then disappointment to this viewer.

The topic, quite frankly, on the surface seemed unworthy of discussion and, really, none of their business.  They discussed of basketball game in San Antonio between two high schools; one with a majority of Caucasians, one with a majority of Latinos.  The Caucasian school won the game, whereupon, the winning school’s student body began chanting, “U.S.A, U.S.A.”!  In the aftermath of this, the leadership of the winning high school issued an apology to their opponents’ school for the behavior of their student body.

To my surprise, the majority of the co-hosts on the show took umbrage with the issued apology as if the school was apologizing for the school’s patriotism…really?  Juan Williams, a liberal whom I generally as a rule disagree with, was the first to show some sanity by explaining that this was not an international game.  This was no triumph of the United States over some visiting foreign team.  This was simply two Texas high schools competing in basketball.  There was no need for chanting “U.S.A.” at their opponent.

As the other commentators converged on Mr. Williams, I despaired that my fellow conservatives were arguing out of blind passion and that none would advocate for common sense.  Thankfully, Dana Perino spoke up with fairness and clear-headedness that should be the banner of all conservatives and agreed with Juan Williams.  This issue is not that difficult.

Some children misbehaved at a basketball game.  They allowed the tensions of the immigration issues of our day filter into their competitive spirit.  There is no international border that separates the two schools, but there is the color of their skin and origin of their race.  Why didn’t they chant the name of their high school, their fight song or their mascot?  The adults present used this as a teaching opportunity. They showed there is a correct way to hail the symbols of your nation and it is not to diminish the validity of your fellow Americans.  The leadership of these schools behaved like adults and handled the matter effectively and rightly.  They are to be commended.

Sometimes, unfortunately, there are times when we as combatants in these ideological wars get so engrossed in staking our ground, we lose focus on truth. We rail against a wrong whether it’s there or not.  It’s what we call here in Maine “right of reason”.  For this matter, the school leaders of San Antonio, Juan Williams and Dana Perino behaved as adults.  Eric Bolling, Andrea Tantaros and Kimberly Guilfoyle, in this instance, did not.