Liberals have added a new hurdle to the implementation and acceptance of truth. One must use the right tone when expressing facts or those facts will be discarded as false. The arrogance of this sentiment is stunning to be kind. To exercise some sort of parental discretion over Maine residents by threatening to disallow an individual’s defined arguments in the platform of civil debate simply because their tone was not correct, is appalling at best. This is the latest diversionary tactic by the media to cover for their President.
The Kennebec Journal recently posted an article “fact checking” Jason Savage, which quickly spiraled into a hit piece rather than the truth seeking they espoused. The theme of the article centered on the issue of the billions of tax cuts that MediCare will endure as a result of ObamaCare, which is now law. While they admitted the numbers and facts are true, they proposed that argument, presented by the Director of Maine People Before Politics, should be disregarded as false, or “mostly false”, on the basis of the poor tone that Mr. Savage used. Mostly false, is this a bad sequel to The Princess Bride?
Anyway, the Journal went on to cite the AARP. Yes, the same AARP that named a strong supporter of Hugo Chavez as “Person of the Year”. They quoted a doctor, who rattled off the infamous “as long as there are no changes” line, ignoring that the costs of ObamaCare have been arcing upwards since its implementation. But my favorite line of “defense” is this little jewel of wisdom by the author, “ Still nothing is really ‘robbed’, the way almost anyone uses the word, and that money is coming largely from reduced payment to hospitals, other health providers and insurers.” So it’s really not robbery to not pay for services rendered as long as you “mostly pay”, or how about “hardly pay”, or, if ask Maine’s hospitals, “never pay”? Really? Miracle Max would be so proud. Fact: Partial payment is not full payment. Oh, did I just use the wrong tone?
In the heated East-West Highway debate, Senator Doug Thomas and the Governor have wisely called for a slowdown to the process to allow for all the facts to be presented amidst all the din and noise. Thomas’ opponent has mocked this call for caution as a political ploy. He neglects to acknowledge that he helped sponsor Doug Thomas’ bill, which was a call for a fact-finding investigation of the possibility of the Highway. So Mr. Hebert Clark of Millinocket (D) voted for the bill before he voted against it despite the fact that the bill he voted for but is now against has yet to reveal the information that he voted for and is now against. But at least his tone was right.
But herein lies the biggest quandary. How can one strike the right tone when those who stand in judgment of the tenor are tone-deaf to anything but their own sound?